Community Forum Report
In 2018 we co-hosted a community forum with Healthy Democracy and the Rosewood Initiative entitled "Bringing Participatory Budgeting to the Portland-Region." This report summaries the forum and its recommendations to local governments for implementing participatory budgeting in the Portland-Metro region.
THE RECOMMENDATIONS
I. Process Design
1. Clearly define the primary goals and objectives for a PB process. Preferred goals were:
-
Social inclusion and social justice
-
Transparency and accountability
-
Civic education and leadership development
-
Fostering community, trust, and democratic deliberation
2. Provide adequate funding for
-
Staff time for outreach and engagement.
-
implementation and administration.
-
Translation, interpretation, transportation, or other needs to reduce or eliminate barriers to participation by the least served and least represented communities.
-
Capacity building in underserved and underrepresented communities and organizations that can help make PB a success long-term.
3. Make participatory budgeting fun. Incorporate game design into PB design to make participation more fun, engaging, inclusive, fair and transparent.
II. Implementation
-
Start small and build on success through an effective pilot PB process.
-
Follow Greensboro's example, by enlisting private foundations to help fund initial "start-up" implementation costs.
-
Don’t do a one-off process. Commit to at least 3 cycles to allow for learning by both the community members and local government staff.
-
Fully evaluate PB processes to learn and improve over time.
III. Support & Training for staff and participants
-
Follow Seattle's lead in establishing a paid steering committee that resources the time and expertise of individuals, especially those from underserved and underrepresented communities.
-
Provide PB training for elected officials, local government staff, steering committee members, and representative community leaders.
-
Explore the use and development of “budget stimulator”, as in Greensboro, North Carolina, to link PB to the larger municipal budgeting process.
IV. Community Engagement
-
Enlist the full diversity of the community in designing a pilot PB process that prioritizes equity and inclusion.
-
Sustainably fund and center PB processes on vulnerable, underserved or underrepresented communities.
-
Create a PB process is that is open and welcoming to community members (e.g. students, non-citizens, and others) who are currently ineligible to vote in elections.
V. Possible Focuses
-
Consider models in Seattle, Boston, and Phoenix that started PB with youth or students.
-
Focus it on a specific high need district or a particular sub-population (e.g. youth).
-
Use the pilot PB process to allocate discretionary funds with fewer policy or legal constraints on potential outcomes.
-
Use PB to build skills and knowledge in vulnerable, underserved or under-represented communities before scaling PB processes up to the entire population.